First matter of business, thank you to all of you who have been frequenting the site. For those of you waiting for the SMTW pieces, you will be rewarded tomorrow. For now however, I'd like to take a look at what turned out to be one the most intriguing Offensive Rookie of the Year races in recent memory.
no griping from me if Russell Wilson won the award.
The argument for Andrew Luck:
The consensus number one pick since the end of his junior year, Luck had an incredible year by all measures. Leading all rookies in pass attempts, completions and touchdowns, Luck was able to lead a team that had previously won two games, to an eleven win season and a playoff birth. Luck was able to do all this with a drastically worse defense than Wilson and Griffin. Luck did benefit from the 4th ranked rushing yards per game and threw eight more interceptions than Wilson, and thirteen more than Griffin. Had Luck won the award it would have shown that the voters were basing their decision on what that player means to their team; almost an MVP sort of mindset. With that, I would have no complaints if Andrew Luck was named Offensive Rookie of the Year.
The argument for Robert Griffin III:
in the Option Read), as well as the league's best pass defense.
Robert Griffin III being named the league's Offensive Rookie of the Year shows that the voters were looking largely at statistics as the basis of their vote. In a race that saw three rookie quarterbacks lead their teams to the playoffs, Griffin had one of the most efficient seasons as a passer by a rookie. Add this to his dazzling running ability, and you have one of the most dynamic offensive players in the NFL right now. As a fan of the game of football, and regardless of my being an Eagles fan, I hope that this man can stay healthy throughout his career. If so, I think we may witness one of the most spectacular careers in NFL history.
skins had the league's best pass defense? get your facts right kid
ReplyDelete